Seizure of goods not justified if defects in E-way Bill not subsist on the date of passing of order of detention

It would appear that, in the meanwhile, between the date of apprehending the goods at the parcel office and the date on which the order of detention was passed, the e-way bill had already been updated by filling the Part B thereof. This is evident from Ext.P6 that is produced along with the writ petition.

from TaxGuru https://ift.tt/3glUbdB
via IFTTT